David vs Goliath - An American Woman, The Queen of England and a Court of Record vs USA corp - a Discussion
30.10.2011 18:24 in news
Ann Arka Very interesting initiative. However I was alarmed to read this on your web:
"The Global Isles Court of Record is the unity of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and “We the People”. This is the birthright of the English speaking people the world over: A neutral Court of Record of the Sovereign. This ancient right goes back in time to the Magna Carta of 1215 and further into antiquity."
How does unity with the monarch, the representative of an organization who colludes with the cabal and mafia-like clans and institutions that are behind the farce, all unelected organizations and individuals like herself, the Rothschilds, the Vatican, the UN, the IMF, etc. help us, the people? When Elizabeth II is behind the supranational organizations intent on controlling the world, i.e. UN (formerly known as The League of Nations) and is part of that very elite?
I'd appreciate if you could explain this as I'm sure I haven't understood correctly since freedom and association with autocrats are mutually exclusive.October 25 at 12:36am
Court of Record A Court of Record has to follow the narrow path of protecting property, liberty and the Rule of Law.
You first have to ask about the meaning of the word "unity". A longer essay on this point is necessary. The "unity" one speaks of, is the 'identity' of sameness that allows you to see 'apple' in a golden delicious, and gala and all varieties. The Greek philosophers took a lot of trouble to define 'unity'.
The 'unity' here is that the Court has to protect private property - Her Majesty The Queen has as much a right to protect Her Majesty's property and liberty as you do.
There is a lot of conditioning that results from 'education'. See John Taylor Gatto. http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/underground/index.htm.
Ann Arka Right, you mean that the only thing that the quoted sentence I highlighted implies is that the Queen is taken down from her pedestal to be on the level of the people law-wise?
I know Gatto, thank you, I've published his work in Spanish and written extensively about him and his work.October 25 at 7:05am
Court of Record Hello Ann,
English Common Law has always held the King to be not above the (unwritten) Common Law and required by Common Law to enforce it and protect the liberty of His Majesty's subjects. See Magna Carta 1215, Bill of Rights 1688. The Bill of Rights is a contract. It required the King to protect his subjects and ensure their liberties.
Liberty is the right to create and dispose of (sell, trade etc) one's creations. Freedom is the right to do as one pleases subject to the limitation of the Common Law - which is the limitation that all people are subject to of a Court of Record. A Court of Record itself is a Common Law jury - each man or woman in the jury with all the rights and privileges of a freeman/Lord.
Being a freeman/Lord (variation of degree only) means having all the faculties of a King = knowing the difference between money and currency, knowing how to conduct oneself in court as a King, having the right to an army let alone arms, etc.
It is the aberration in America is the Constitution where some very clever people managed to fool new English speakers (America was not only English, there were plenty of Europeans at the time of the revolution). There is an analysis of the USA constitution here: http://www.rayservers.com/blog/the-us-con - read it without being put off.
The short version is that Lorene, you and I and 50 other people cannot get together and write a contract "We The People of the World" ... and bind the people of the world... swearing an Oath is accepting a contract. See essay on jurisdiction: http://www.rayservers.com/blog/jurisdiction
Then of course, you have to realize that swearing an oath to a piece of paper is very silly... you cannot contract with a dead thing - See No Treason by Lysander Spooner http://jim.com/treason.htm. You are *alive*, which means making choices... for example, shooting the rapist dead.
Common Law is not manufactured in a Legislature. The "Law" or Act of the Legislature is only a suggestion to a Court of Record. Statutes against murder do not trump your Right to Kill when your life, liberty and property are in danger. This is not to say that you can shoot blindly - you are doing to have to be able to justify your actions to an investigative Grand Jury.
The jury system in America has been corrupted - just as the Common Law was replaced with Roman Law, money (gold) replaced with paper (FRNs) then FRNs with bits on a bank computer, juries have been corrupted because people do not know the difference between being a Woman and being a Citizen. Today's canned juries are a very sad state of affairs.
The litany of "rights" promoted by the United Nations is a farce. "All Rights Reserved" at Common Law is the real deal.
p.s. A sequence of essays that being the process of de-schooling that is essential to follow this Court of Record is here: http://gsfsystem.ch/discov
Ann Arka Thanks for this. I was aware of Common Law and have watched some interesting court actions in England where people have forced the judge to swear that the proceedings would be conducted under common law and not maritime(?) law. I find it very interesting but unfortunately I think that in Spain where I live, things have been tied up a bit tighter, I'm not quite sure if Common Law exists here... the Constitution is a joke.
Court of Record Common Law exists everywhere. You have to know to use it. It may not be possible to use it:
The comparative history of the Spanish conquests (Latin America) and those of the British (India, Africa, etc) gives you the difference.
Where the Roman Catholic Religion was given free reign, there exists not much of a trace of the people, culture or history. This is a fact.
The USA Constituion was modeled on the subtle frauds of the Roman Catholic Church. http://home.earthlink.net/~walterk1/Patr/US/USPagan.html
It is very hard for US Citizens to realize that this is a lower, inferior position to thinking of themselves as Americans. As Americans, the USA corp is their servant, just as Her Majesty's government is the servant of Her Majesty and Her Majesty's people.
Read The English Constitution by Walter Bagehot to see the marked differences in resulting governance already visible by the mid 1800s. One remains civil, the other has degenerated to near tyranny.